Frameworks & Regulatory Alignment
Alethexa structures its analytical model with reference to established international sanctions, AML/CFT, trade governance, and responsible sourcing frameworks. While operating independently, the firm calibrates transaction-level evaluations against applicable regulatory regimes and industry standards relevant to the jurisdictions and commodities involved.
Alethexa is not a regulatory authority and does not represent governmental agencies or industry bodies. Reference to the above frameworks reflects analytical alignment and evaluation calibration within transaction assessments.
I. Sanctions & Governmental Regimes
Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
United States sanctions framework applicable to financial institutions, trade flows, and designated entities.
European Union Sanctions Regimes
EU restrictive measures applicable to cross-border trade and counterparty exposure.
United Nations Sanctions Programs
Security Council resolutions governing international prohibitions and embargoes.
UK Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI)
United Kingdom sanctions administration and enforcement.
United Arab Emirates Regulatory Alignment
Federal and financial free-zone compliance standards relevant to UAE-based trade structures.
II. AML / CFT & Financial Crime Standards
Financial Action Task Force (FATF)
Risk-based AML/CFT guidance influencing jurisdictional compliance obligations.
OECD Governance & Anti-Bribery Standards
Frameworks shaping transparency expectations in cross-border trade.
III. Responsible Sourcing & Commodity-Specific Standards
Responsible sourcing frameworks inform Alethexa’s treatment of higher-risk commodities and supply chains.
Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI)
Supply chain due diligence standards for high-risk minerals and metals.
London Bullion Market Association (LBMA)
Good Delivery and responsible sourcing standards relevant to precious metals verification.
Alethexa is not a regulatory authority and does not represent governmental agencies or industry bodies. Reference to the above frameworks reflects analytical alignment and evaluation calibration within transaction assessments.